Friday, January 15, 2010

Who is Scott Brown?

Prospects for the GOP are huge in the Massachusetts special election for US Senate set for next Tuesday. A Republican victory could mean destroying the Democratic supermajority in the Senate and hence a possible end to ObamaCare. The seat has been held by the Democrats since JFK, and I heard on the radio that no one this conservative has ever done so well in Massachusetts.

But just who is Scott Brown?

Scott Brown is not a conservative. Scott Brown is a progressive neoconservative. According to the Washington Post, Scott Brown
is an insurgent who was somewhat disconnected from the national Republican Party.


Just listen to how Scott Brown describes himself:

"I’m going to be the only person down there who is going to be the independent voter and thinker"

Brown, one of only five Republican senators in the 40-member Massachusetts state senate, also describes himself as “fiscally conservative and socially conscious."

Scott Brown says "the mission is not over" in Afghanistan, and supported President Obama's troop surge.

Brown supported the 2006 RomneyCare "reform" in Massachusetts, which forces all residents to buy health insurance. He said in an interview with Sean Hannity that the current "reform" being proposed by the Democrats in Washington is a bad idea because it would "cut half a trillion for Medicare".

Scott Brown called Roe vs. Wade "the law of the land". He supports the "right" to on-demand, unlimited, legalized abortion. The Boston Globe called his abortion views "nuanced".

Scott Brown voted for a regional cap-and-trade system in his state, which the Boston Globe says increased energy prices in the Northeast.

Scott Brown = neoconservative

A neoconservative is NOT a conservative.

I'd encourage everyone to learn more about the true conservative in the race, a libertarian tea party activist, Joe Kennedy.

Let's support a true conservative in this race. I've heard a lot of people say they won't support Joe Kennedy because he'd be a spoiler for Brown. "We need that seat to defeat ObamaCare," they say.

But just how much truth is behind this? Let's look at some facts.

1. The Democrats have a goal of finishing all reconciliation done and moving to a vote by the close of the month. They want the president to sign it into law before the State of the Union.

2. The election is Tuesday, January 19th. Under state law, the governor cannot certify an election until AT LEAST a week after the election. BUT the election results cannot be certified until all municipalities have certified their local results. Municipalites have 15 days to do this. It could be February 3rd before the (Democratic) governor even looks at the results.

And even if Scott Brown DOES win the race (which is unlikely), and takes office before the ObamaCare vote (even more unlikely), is it really safe to assume that he would vote against the "reform"? Remember how he voted on RomneyCare?

8 comments:

  1. Alex, he might not be truly conservative, but that woman is a full fledged left-wing Progressive. When she was DA, she let off a guy who raped an 18 month old with a curling iron. The NEXT DA had to put the guy in ja

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, we usually end up voting for the lesser of two evils. Remember that Ross Perot was the single biggest reason Bush the Elder lost to Clinton.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's why we need a run-off system, such as instant run-off voting. How many times are we going to get put in this trap?

    ReplyDelete
  4. No, what we need is a different voting system that allows one to vote their consious without risking the greater of two evils.
    Preferintial Voting fills that bill.
    Look it up on wikipedia.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferential_voting

    ReplyDelete
  5. What's the difference between preferential voting and instant run-off voting?

    I've been in favor of instant run-off voting for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Are you implying that the National Republican Party is more conservative than progressive-neocon? That ship has sailed my friend!

    Kennedy lines up with the true conservative ideology more than Brown but he doesn't have a shot in hell at winning the election.

    A vote for Kennedy is essentially a vote for Coakley and she's so far to the left that even the worst of the progressive-neocons won't dream of emulating her moonbattery.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice work, Alex. I am impressed with your writing style and thank you for your insight.

    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  8. "is it really safe to assume that he would vote against the "reform"?"

    WTF? It's been the center of his entire campaign!

    Back away from the bong.

    ReplyDelete